[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0VKZ+AxQdcnaEax@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:11:19 +0800
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
bp@...en8.de, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
dave.jiang@...el.com, irenic.rajneesh@...il.com,
david.e.box@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86/cpu: Refresh DCA leaf reading code
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:53:34AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:53:34 -0800
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 05/11] x86/cpu: Refresh DCA leaf reading code
>
>
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> The DCA leaf number is also hard-coded in the CPUID level dependency
> table. Move its definition to common code and use it.
>
> While at it, fix up the naming and types in the probe code. All
> CPUID data is provided in 32-bit registers, not 'unsigned long'.
> Also stop referring to "level_9". Move away from test_bit()
> because the type is no longer an 'unsigned long'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h | 3 ++-
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 +-
> b/drivers/dma/ioat/dca.c | 8 +++++---
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h~dca-leaf-checks-1 arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h~dca-leaf-checks-1 2024-11-20 11:44:17.721669887 -0800
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h 2024-11-20 11:44:17.725670041 -0800
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ enum cpuid_regs_idx {
> CPUID_EDX,
> };
>
> -#define CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF 5
> +#define CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF 0x5
Nit, this change can be merged into patch 1?
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists