linux-kernel - Re: [DO NOT MERGE PATCH v4 15/19] dt-bindings: firmware: imx: Add SCU controlled display pixel link nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6rijytubyumhgvhlvzx3dtyfncknizs3iz7arhno2mjottyu33@subihom7khzl>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:01:33 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, 
	maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, 
	simona@...ll.ch, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, 
	festevam@...il.com, glx@...utronix.de, vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, 
	aisheng.dong@....com, agx@...xcpu.org, francesco@...cini.it, frank.li@....com, 
	dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [DO NOT MERGE PATCH v4 15/19] dt-bindings: firmware: imx: Add
 SCU controlled display pixel link nodes

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 05:33:12PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> Document SCU controlled display pixel link child nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
> ---
> v4:
> * No change.
> 
> v3:
> * No change.
> 
> v2:
> * New patch as needed by display controller subsystem device tree.

DO NOT MERGE means also do not review?

Your cover letter does not explain what you want here, except not
merging. Why posting things which should not be merged, without context?

I'll ignore this patch for now.

Best regards,
Krzysztof