[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d3862ea-4112-4a03-9e4b-ac4e8e23a7f4@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:09:56 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: s390: Increase size of union sca_utility to
four bytes
On 11/26/24 11:25 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
[...]
> union sca_utility {
Would you mind adding a comment?
""Utility is defined as 2 bytes but having it 4 bytes wide generates
more efficient code. Since the following bytes are reserved this makes
no functional difference.""
> - __u16 val;
> + __u32 val;
> struct {
> - __u16 mtcr : 1;
> - __u16 reserved : 15;
> + __u32 mtcr : 1;
> + __u32 : 31;
> };
> };
>
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ struct bsca_block {
> __u64 reserved[5];
> __u64 mcn;
> union sca_utility utility;
> - __u8 reserved2[6];
> + __u8 reserved2[4];
> struct bsca_entry cpu[KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS];
> };
>
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct esca_block {
> union ipte_control ipte_control;
> __u64 reserved1[6];
> union sca_utility utility;
> - __u8 reserved2[6];
> + __u8 reserved2[4];
> __u64 mcn[4];
> __u64 reserved3[20];
> struct esca_entry cpu[KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS];
Powered by blists - more mailing lists