lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0YTrwR67-5T86E6@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:30:07 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>,
	Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
	Asahi Linux <asahi@...ts.linux.dev>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/18] Implement DWARF modversions

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 08:42:21PM +0000, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> If you also want to test the series with actual Rust modules, this
> branch adds Matt's latest modversion_info series:

The merge window for v6.13 is now open so this is too late for that, so
this is all work to be queued up after, so in about 2 weeks or so. Given
that, considering this and the extended modversions patches what I don't
see is actual selftests to easily test this and extended modversions.
Could you guys add tests for this? Since we have automated tests for
modules and we now extended it with another new test for kallsyms under
the modules directly it should be fairly easy I think to add tests for
this. Think about how we can easily grow these tests to ensure we don't
break things with future kernel regressions.

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ