linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] objtool: Handle unsorted table offset of rodata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53677c5f-2ea5-a227-66f7-b27c27665f6b@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:01:33 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
 <peterz@...radead.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] objtool: Handle unsorted table offset of rodata



On 11/27/2024 09:20 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 09:28:19PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>> +		/* Handle the special cases compiled with Clang on LoongArch */
>>> +		if (file->elf->ehdr.e_machine == EM_LOONGARCH &&
>>> +		    reloc->sym->type == STT_SECTION && reloc != table &&
>>> +		    reloc_offset(reloc) == reloc_offset(table) + rodata_table_size)
>>> +			break;
>>
>> I think it can be generic, like this:
>>
>>                 /* Check for the end of the table: */
>>                 if (reloc != table && reloc == next_table)
>>                         break;
>>
>>                 if (reloc != table &&
>>                     reloc_offset(reloc) == reloc_offset(table) +
>> rodata_table_size)
>>                         break;
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I'm not sure, this patch is hard to review because it uses
> insn->table_size which doesn't get set until the next patch.
>
> Maybe this patch should come after patches 7 & 8, or maybe they should
> be squashed?

OK, I will squash the changes into patch #7.