lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLgiH+hu-VA4GTCWRaEBVXoENX36P16EQzDadJptNi=vk8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:07:24 +0100
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
Subject: Re: rust/helpers/jump_label.c:10:5: sparse: sparse: symbol
 'rust_helper_static_key_count' was not declared. Should it be static?

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:38 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head:   b50ecc5aca4d18f1f0c4942f5c797bc85edef144
> commit: 6e59bcc9c8adec9a5bbedfa95a89946c56c510d9 rust: add static_branch_unlikely for static_key_false
> date:   3 weeks ago
> config: um-randconfig-r111-20241126 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241127/202411271011.gFsgMWRv-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 592c0fe55f6d9a811028b5f3507be91458ab2713)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241127/202411271011.gFsgMWRv-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411271011.gFsgMWRv-lkp@intel.com/
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
> >> rust/helpers/jump_label.c:10:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'rust_helper_static_key_count' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/mutex.c:11:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'rust_helper___mutex_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/helpers.c: note: in included file:
>    rust/helpers/spinlock.c:16:6: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'rust_helper_spin_lock' - wrong count at exit
>    rust/helpers/spinlock.c:21:6: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'rust_helper_spin_unlock' - unexpected unlock
>
> vim +/rust_helper_static_key_count +10 rust/helpers/jump_label.c
>
>      8
>      9  #ifndef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
>   > 10  int rust_helper_static_key_count(struct static_key *key)

Can we turn off sparse warnings for rust/helpers?

Alice

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ