[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241128020009.83347-1-longman@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:00:09 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] locking/lockdep: Enforce PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING only if ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
Relax the rule to set PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING by default only for arches
that supports PREEMPT_RT. For arches that do not support PREEMPT_RT,
they will not be forced to address unimportant raw lock nesting issues
when they want to enable PROVE_LOCKING. They do have the option
to enable it to look for these raw locking nesting problems if they
choose to.
Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 1e37c62e8595..942b4cb138bd 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1397,9 +1397,9 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
For more details, see Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst.
config PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
- bool
+ bool "Enable raw_spinlock - spinlock nesting checks" if !ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
depends on PROVE_LOCKING
- default y
+ default y if ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
help
Enable the raw_spinlock vs. spinlock nesting checks which ensure
that the lock nesting rules for PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels are
--
2.47.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists