| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Z0gVxWstZdKvhY6m@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:03:33 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch_numa: Restore nid checks before registering a
memblock with a node
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 07:30:00PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Commit 767507654c22 ("arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks")
> significantly cleaned up the NUMA registration code, but also
> dropped a significant check that was refusing to accept to
> configure a memblock with an invalid nid.
>
> On "quality hardware" such as my ThunderX machine, this results
> in a kernel that dies immediately:
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x431f0a10]
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.12.0-00013-g8920d74cf8db (maz@...ley-girl) (gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40) #3872 SMP PREEMPT Wed Nov 27 15:25:49 GMT 2024
> [ 0.000000] KASLR disabled due to lack of seed
> [ 0.000000] Machine model: Cavium ThunderX CN88XX board
> [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v2.4 by American Megatrends
> [ 0.000000] efi: ESRT=0xffce0ff18 SMBIOS 3.0=0xfffb0000 ACPI 2.0=0xffec60000 MEMRESERVE=0xffc905d98
> [ 0.000000] esrt: Reserving ESRT space from 0x0000000ffce0ff18 to 0x0000000ffce0ff50.
> [ 0.000000] earlycon: pl11 at MMIO 0x000087e024000000 (options '115200n8')
> [ 0.000000] printk: legacy bootconsole [pl11] enabled
> [ 0.000000] NODE_DATA(0) allocated [mem 0xff6754580-0xff67566bf]
> [ 0.000000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000001d40
> [ 0.000000] Mem abort info:
> [ 0.000000] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
> [ 0.000000] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> [ 0.000000] SET = 0, FnV = 0
> [ 0.000000] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> [ 0.000000] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
> [ 0.000000] Data abort info:
> [ 0.000000] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
> [ 0.000000] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> [ 0.000000] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
> [ 0.000000] [0000000000001d40] user address but active_mm is swapper
> [ 0.000000] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.12.0-00013-g8920d74cf8db #3872
> [ 0.000000] Hardware name: Cavium ThunderX CN88XX board (DT)
> [ 0.000000] pstate: a00000c5 (NzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 0.000000] pc : sparse_init_nid+0x54/0x428
> [ 0.000000] lr : sparse_init+0x118/0x240
> [ 0.000000] sp : ffff800081da3cb0
> [ 0.000000] x29: ffff800081da3cb0 x28: 0000000fedbab10c x27: 0000000000000001
> [ 0.000000] x26: 0000000ffee250f8 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffff800082102cd0
> [ 0.000000] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 00000000001fffff
> [ 0.000000] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> [ 0.000000] x17: 0000000001b00000 x16: 0000000ffd130000 x15: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.000000] x14: 00000000003e0000 x13: 00000000000001c8 x12: 0000000000000014
> [ 0.000000] x11: ffff800081e82860 x10: ffff8000820fb2c8 x9 : ffff8000820fb490
> [ 0.000000] x8 : 0000000000ffed20 x7 : 0000000000000014 x6 : 00000000001fffff
> [ 0.000000] x5 : 00000000ffffffff x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
> [ 0.000000] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000040 x0 : 0000000000000007
> [ 0.000000] Call trace:
> [ 0.000000] sparse_init_nid+0x54/0x428
> [ 0.000000] sparse_init+0x118/0x240
> [ 0.000000] bootmem_init+0x70/0x1c8
> [ 0.000000] setup_arch+0x184/0x270
> [ 0.000000] start_kernel+0x74/0x670
> [ 0.000000] __primary_switched+0x80/0x90
> [ 0.000000] Code: f865d804 d37df060 cb030000 d2800003 (b95d4084)
> [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
> [ 0.000000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---
>
> while previous kernel versions were able to recognise how brain-damaged
> the machine is, and only build a fake node.
>
> Restoring the check brings back some sanity and a "working" system.
>
> Fixes: 767507654c22 ("arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index e187016764265..5457248eb0811 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,21 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn)
> static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
> {
> int nid;
> -
> + struct memblock_region *mblk;
> +
> + /* Check that valid nid is set to memblks */
> + for_each_mem_region(mblk) {
> + int mblk_nid = memblock_get_region_node(mblk);
> + phys_addr_t start = mblk->base;
> + phys_addr_t end = mblk->base + mblk->size - 1;
> +
> + if (mblk_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || mblk_nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> + pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %pap-%pap]\n",
> + mblk_nid, &start, &end);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
We have memblock_validate_numa_coverage() that checks that amount of memory
with unset node id is less than a threshold. The loop here can be replaced
with something like
if (!memblock_validate_numa_coverage(0))
return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> /* Finally register nodes. */
> for_each_node_mask(nid, numa_nodes_parsed) {
> unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists