[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87378b2f-80a0-4a35-9989-9b96910701e3@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:31:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH can-next v2] dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: add missing
required clock-names
On 28/11/2024 08:09, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> tcan4x5x requires an external clock called cclk, add it here.
Nothing improved. Device already has this clock, so your rationale is
not correct.
Also, offending patch is not in the next for some reason, so it should
be squashed there. Conversion which leads to incorrect binding is not a
correct conversion.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists