[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tmu6inhqzkecgdrnv3yip6fjoelcyby5b7ascby54afcn5iune@jd4lk4p5kplt>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:49:11 +0100
From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH can-next v2] dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: add missing
required clock-names
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 08:31:41AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/11/2024 08:09, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> > tcan4x5x requires an external clock called cclk, add it here.
>
> Nothing improved. Device already has this clock, so your rationale is
> not correct.
Please explain, yes the device has this clock, but not the name. The
driver depends on the name.
>
> Also, offending patch is not in the next for some reason, so it should
> be squashed there. Conversion which leads to incorrect binding is not a
> correct conversion.
"offending patch":
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/commit/?h=testing&id=77400284f54b9a1f6b6127c08cb935fc05e5c3d2
"dt-bindings: can: convert tcan4x5x.txt to DT schema" did the
conversion no more or less.
The original txt file fails to mention the clock required,
therefore IMHO this patch should be as a seperate patch :)
/Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists