[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f9fd840-6421-43b5-9a12-edfa96e067cc@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:08:27 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: map pages in advance
On 28.11.24 12:37, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> We are current refactoring struct page to make it smaller, removing
> unneeded fields that correctly belong to struct folio.
>
> Two of those fields are page->index and page->mapping. Perf is currently
> making use of both of these, so this patch removes this usage as it turns
> out it is unnecessary.
>
> Perf establishes its own internally controlled memory-mapped pages using
> vm_ops hooks. The first page in the mapping is the read/write user control
> page, and the rest of the mapping consists of read-only pages.
>
> The VMA is backed by kernel memory either from the buddy allocator or
> vmalloc depending on configuration. It is intended to be mapped read/write,
> but because it has a page_mkwrite() hook, vma_wants_writenotify() indicaets
> that it should be mapped read-only.
>
> When a write fault occurs, the provided page_mkwrite() hook,
> perf_mmap_fault() (doing double duty handing faults as well) uses the
> vmf->pgoff field to determine if this is the first page, allowing for the
> desired read/write first page, read-only rest mapping.
>
> For this to work the implementation has to carefully work around faulting
> logic. When a page is write-faulted, the fault() hook is called first, then
> its page_mkwrite() hook is called (to allow for dirty tracking in file
> systems).
>
> On fault we set the folio's mapping in perf_mmap_fault(), this is because
> when do_page_mkwrite() is subsequently invoked, it treats a missing mapping
> as an indicator that the fault should be retried.
>
> We also set the folio's index so, given the folio is being treated as faux
> user memory, it correctly references its offset within the VMA.
>
> This explains why the mapping and index fields are used - but it's not
> necessary.
>
> We preallocate pages when perf_mmap() is called for the first time via
> rb_alloc(), and further allocate auxiliary pages via rb_aux_alloc() as
> needed if the mapping requires it.
>
> This allocation is done in the f_ops->mmap() hook provided in perf_mmap(),
> and so we can instead simply map all the memory right away here - there's
> no point in handling (read) page faults when we don't demand page nor need
> to be notified about them (perf does not).
>
> This patch therefore changes this logic to map everything when the mmap()
> hook is called, establishing a PFN map. It implements vm_ops->pfn_mkwrite()
> to provide the required read/write vs. read-only behaviour, which does not
> require the previously implemented workarounds.
>
> It makes sense semantically to establish a PFN map too - we are managing
> the pages internally and so it is appropriate to mark this as a special
> mapping.
It's rather sad seeing more PFNMAP users where PFNMAP is not really
required (-> this is struct page backed).
Especially having to perform several independent remap_pfn_range() calls
rather looks like yet another workaround ...
Would we be able to achieve something comparable with vm_insert_pages(),
to just map them in advance?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists