[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241129091013.029fced3@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 09:10:13 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Lee Jones
<lee@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Derek Kiernan
<derek.kiernan@....com>, Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>, Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Lars Povlsen
<lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund
<Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, Daniel Machon
<daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Allan Nielsen
<allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] misc: Add support for LAN966x PCI device
Hi Michal,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:42:53 +0100
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz> wrote:
...
> > --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > @@ -610,6 +610,30 @@ config MARVELL_CN10K_DPI
> > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> > will be called mrvl_cn10k_dpi.
> >
> > +config MCHP_LAN966X_PCI
> > + tristate "Microchip LAN966x PCIe Support"
> > + depends on PCI
> > + select OF
> > + select OF_OVERLAY
>
> Are these "select" statements what we want? When configuring current
> mainline snapshot, I accidentally enabled this driver and ended up
> flooded with an enormous amount of new config options, most of which
> didn't make much sense on x86_64. It took quite long to investigate why.
>
> Couldn't we rather use
>
> depends on PCI && OF && OF_OVERLAY
>
> like other drivers?
>
I don't have a strong opinion on this 'select' vs 'depends on' for those
symbols.
I used select because the dependency is not obvious for a user that just
want the driver for the LAN966x PCI device.
Best regards,
Hervé
Powered by blists - more mailing lists