lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173289499954.164764.13681710232652992672.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:43:19 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: yukuai3@...wei.com, jack@...e.cz, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix bfqq uaf in bfq_limit_depth()


On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 17:15:09 +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Set new allocated bfqq to bic or remove freed bfqq from bic are both
> protected by bfqd->lock, however bfq_limit_depth() is deferencing bfqq
> from bic without the lock, this can lead to UAF if the io_context is
> shared by multiple tasks.
> 
> For example, test bfq with io_uring can trigger following UAF in v6.6:
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] block, bfq: fix bfqq uaf in bfq_limit_depth()
      commit: e8b8344de3980709080d86c157d24e7de07d70ad

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ