[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <674945f4.050a0220.253251.00a1.GAE@google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:41:24 -0800
From: syzbot <syzbot+da63448ae44acf902d11@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: cem@...nel.org, chandan.babu@...cle.com, djwong@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] [xfs?] possible deadlock in xfs_qm_dqrele
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: b86545e02e8c Merge tag 'acpi-6.13-rc1-2' of git://git.kern..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=157723c0580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=5f0b9d4913852126
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da63448ae44acf902d11
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7feb34a89c2a/non_bootable_disk-b86545e0.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/00ec87aaa7ee/vmlinux-b86545e0.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fcc70e20d51b/bzImage-b86545e0.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+da63448ae44acf902d11@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-syzkaller-10553-gb86545e02e8c #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd1/80 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880548028e0 (&dqp->q_qlock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xfs_dqlock fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.h:131 [inline]
ffff8880548028e0 (&dqp->q_qlock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xfs_qm_dqrele+0xce/0x240 fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c:1124
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8ea3f620 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6864 [inline]
ffffffff8ea3f620 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7246
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3851 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3865
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4055 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4133 [inline]
__kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x41/0x390 mm/slub.c:4309
kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:901 [inline]
kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1037 [inline]
kobject_uevent_env+0x28b/0x8e0 lib/kobject_uevent.c:540
set_capacity_and_notify+0x206/0x240 block/genhd.c:95
loop_set_size drivers/block/loop.c:232 [inline]
loop_set_status+0x584/0x8f0 drivers/block/loop.c:1285
lo_ioctl+0xcbc/0x1f50
blkdev_ioctl+0x57d/0x6a0 block/ioctl.c:693
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#17){++++}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
bio_queue_enter block/blk.h:75 [inline]
blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1536/0x23a0 block/blk-mq.c:3092
__submit_bio+0x2c6/0x560 block/blk-core.c:629
__submit_bio_noacct_mq block/blk-core.c:710 [inline]
submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x4d3/0xe30 block/blk-core.c:739
xlog_state_release_iclog+0x41d/0x7b0 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c:567
xlog_force_iclog fs/xfs/xfs_log.c:802 [inline]
xlog_force_and_check_iclog fs/xfs/xfs_log.c:2866 [inline]
xfs_log_force+0x616/0x960 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c:2943
xfs_qm_dqflush+0xd5e/0x15e0 fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c:1333
xfs_qm_flush_one+0x129/0x430 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:1489
xfs_qm_dquot_walk+0x232/0x4a0 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:90
xfs_qm_quotacheck+0x357/0x6f0 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:1569
xfs_qm_mount_quotas+0x38f/0x680 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:1693
xfs_mountfs+0x1e60/0x2410 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c:1030
xfs_fs_fill_super+0x12db/0x1590 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c:1791
get_tree_bdev_flags+0x48c/0x5c0 fs/super.c:1636
vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x2b0 fs/super.c:1814
do_new_mount+0x2be/0xb40 fs/namespace.c:3507
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3847 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4057 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2d6/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:4034
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&dqp->q_qlock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1ac/0xee0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:735
xfs_dqlock fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.h:131 [inline]
xfs_qm_dqrele+0xce/0x240 fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c:1124
xfs_qm_dqdetach+0x157/0x380 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:422
xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable+0x276/0xf60 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:2253
destroy_inode fs/inode.c:386 [inline]
evict+0x7af/0x9a0 fs/inode.c:827
dispose_list fs/inode.c:845 [inline]
prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:1033
super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:437
shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:664
shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4836
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4897 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4975 [inline]
shrink_node+0x37c5/0x3e50 mm/vmscan.c:5956
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6785 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6977 [inline]
kswapd+0x1ca9/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7246
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&dqp->q_qlock --> &q->q_usage_counter(io)#17 --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#17);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&dqp->q_qlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kswapd1/80:
#0: ffffffff8ea3f620 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6864 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8ea3f620 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7246
#1: ffff88801fbb20e0 (&type->s_umount_key#45){++++}-{4:4}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
#1: ffff88801fbb20e0 (&type->s_umount_key#45){++++}-{4:4}, at: super_cache_scan+0x94/0x4b0 fs/super.c:196
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 80 Comm: kswapd1 Not tainted 6.12.0-syzkaller-10553-gb86545e02e8c #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1ac/0xee0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:735
xfs_dqlock fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.h:131 [inline]
xfs_qm_dqrele+0xce/0x240 fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c:1124
xfs_qm_dqdetach+0x157/0x380 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c:422
xfs_inode_mark_reclaimable+0x276/0xf60 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:2253
destroy_inode fs/inode.c:386 [inline]
evict+0x7af/0x9a0 fs/inode.c:827
dispose_list fs/inode.c:845 [inline]
prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:1033
super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223
do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:437
shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:664
shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4836
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4897 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4975 [inline]
shrink_node+0x37c5/0x3e50 mm/vmscan.c:5956
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6785 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6977 [inline]
kswapd+0x1ca9/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7246
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists