lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241201224126.GB32487@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 14:41:26 -0800
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Radu Rendec <rrendec@...hat.com>,
	Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@....com>, Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] x86/cacheinfo: Set the number of leaves per CPU

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:30:46AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On November 28, 2024 1:22:45 AM GMT+01:00, Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >Changes since v7:
> > * Merged patches 2/3 into one. (Borislav)
> > * Dropped wrapper functions for ci_cpu_cacheinfo. (Borislav)
> > * Check for zero cache leaves in init_cache_level() for x86.
> >   (Borislav)
> > * Removed an ugly line break. (Borislav)
> >
> >Changes since v6:
> >  * Merged patches 1 and 2 into one. (Borislav)
> >  * Fixed an formatting issue in allocate_cache_info(). (Borislav)
> 
> I don't think you should keep the tags after those changes...


OK. Should I post a v9 without the tags? Perhaps I could wait a few days
in case reviewers and testers want to chime in.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ