[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mshe58gq.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 17:57:09 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
Cc: <broonie@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/8] Add QPIC SPI NAND driver
Hi Marc,
On 20/11/2024 at 14:44:58 +0530, Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com> wrote:
> v14:
> * Updated commit message
> * Fix spelling mistake
> * Remove "inline" from multiple APIs from qcom_nandc.c file
> * Move '|' in qcom_param_page_type_exec() APIs at the end of line
I guess it is now time to move on, I can apply patches 2-5 and share an
immutable tag. However, due to the frequent inconsistencies observed
during the lifetime of this patchset, we might be slightly more
conservative than usual and split the patches over two kernel
releases. I fear there might be annoying fixes on the mtd side needed
because of some side effects. Without these, the spi tree might have
broken qcom support for several weeks. What do you think?
Cheers,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists