[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <674e1324.170a0220.377d6f.b6ed@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:05:53 -0800
From: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@...il.com>
To: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
Cc: alexs@...nel.org, Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
minchan@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
david@...hat.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, nphamcs@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/21] mm/zsmalloc: add zpdesc memory descriptor for
zswap.zpool
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 01:04:11PM -0700, Vishal Moola wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:54:14PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/2/24 3:21 PM, alexs@...nel.org wrote:
> > > From: Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>
> > >
> > ...
> >
> > >
> > > This patchset abstracts the memory descriptor used in zsmalloc by zswap/zram.
> > > The descriptor still overlays the struct page; nothing has changed
> > > in that regard. What this patchset accomplishes is the use of folios in
> > > to save some code size, and the introduction of a new concept, zpdesc.
> > > This patchset is just an initial step; it does not bias the potential
> > > changes to kmem_alloc or larger zspage modifications.
> > >
> > ...
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for comments and suggestion from Yosry, Yoo, Sergey, Willy
> > > and Vishal!
> > >
> >
> > This patchset could save 6.3% code size, and it's a nice abstract of zsmalloc
> > memory usage.
> > Is there any more comments, or mind to give a reviewed-by?
>
> Please CC me on future versions. Most of the zsmalloc conversions seem
> ok, but I'd hold off on further iterations of the descriptor patches until
> the maintainers decide on what/how this descriptor will be used
> (i.e. our end goals).
I apologize for leaving this in limbo for this long. This patchset is a
prerequisite to shrinking struct page, so we should get this memdesc in.
I think it's safe to assume (since we've heard no definitive goal from
the maintainers) that in our memdesc world we want zsmalloc + zspage to be
similar to how it currently looks today.
Would you like to rebase this on the current mm-unstable? I'll re-review
it in case anything changed (and can then give you my reviewed-by).
> > Thanks
> > Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists