[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SA1PR12MB7199EA7300F9F1C5D3505C0EB0352@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 04:51:02 +0000
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>
To: Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>, "oliver.upton@...ux.dev"
<oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, "joey.gouly@....com" <joey.gouly@....com>,
"suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>, "yuzenghui@...wei.com"
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "ryan.roberts@....com"
<ryan.roberts@....com>, "shahuang@...hat.com" <shahuang@...hat.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
CC: Aniket Agashe <aniketa@...dia.com>, Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>, Kirti
Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>, "Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)"
<targupta@...dia.com>, Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>, Andy Currid
<acurrid@...dia.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, John Hubbard
<jhubbard@...dia.com>, Dan Williams <danw@...dia.com>, Zhi Wang
<zhiw@...dia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>, Uday Dhoke
<udhoke@...dia.com>, Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@...dia.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"sebastianene@...gle.com" <sebastianene@...gle.com>, "coltonlewis@...gle.com"
<coltonlewis@...gle.com>, "kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...el.com" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "ardb@...nel.org"
<ardb@...nel.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"gshan@...hat.com" <gshan@...hat.com>, "linux-mm@...ck.org"
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: arm64: Map GPU memory with no struct pages
Thanks Don.
> My email client says this patch: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags
> is part of a thread for this titled patchPATCH. Is it?
Those are supposed to be 2 different patches (0/1 being the cover letter, 1/1 the primary patch).
> So, could you clean these two up into (a) a series, or (b) single, separate PATCH's?
Yeah, I'll send it as a patch with a cover letter in a series when I send the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists