[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a8cda3e-8185-0620-32f7-0696a31f4877@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:59:16 -0600
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86: Always complete hypercall via function
callback
On 12/2/24 14:57, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 11/27/24 18:43, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> @@ -10071,13 +10072,15 @@ unsigned long __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr,
>> }
>>
>> out:
>> - return ret;
>> + vcpu->run->hypercall.ret = ret;
>> + complete_hypercall(vcpu);
>> + return 1;
>
> Should this do return complete_hypercall(vcpu) so that you get the
> return code from kvm_skip_emulated_instruction()?
Bah, ignore... already commented on by Xiaoyao.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists