[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74e5b8b5-ee09-4fb5-9643-14ea11c445e5@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:05:54 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)"
<robh@...nel.org>
CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>,
Jagadeesh Kona
<quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Michael
Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add Qualcomm QCS615 Display
clock controller
On 11/8/2024 5:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-dispcc.example.dts:19:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-gcc.h: No such file or directory
>> 19 | #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-gcc.h>
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> compilation terminated.
>> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.dtbs:129: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-dispcc.example.dtb] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make[1]: *** [/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Makefile:1442: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>> make: *** [Makefile:224: __sub-make] Error 2
>>
>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>
>> Seehttps://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20241108-qcs615-mm-clockcontroller-v3-5-7d3b2d235fdf@quicinc.com
>>
>> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
>> should be noted in*this* patch.
> I see this patchset being sent again without changes and receiving same
> errors again, so maybe you expect different results, like some review? I
> don't know, but just in case that's the case please carefully read
> message you got.
>
> If lack of review is expected, then of course no problem here.
The base patch dependency(GCC) clock controller was mentioned in the
cover letter:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241022-qcs615-clock-driver-v4-0-3d716ad0d987@quicinc.com/
Thanks, I will keep a note to notify reviewers explicitly mentioning the
dependency.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists