[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0df58435-94e7-4b81-b688-ec0e1c49c0e0@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 09:13:43 +1100
From: Amirreza Zarrabi <quic_azarrabi@...cinc.com>
To: Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Jens Wiklander
<jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
"Bjorn
Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski
<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) driver for
Qualcomm TEE (QTEE)
Based on our discussions, we implemented significant changes. We essentially
rewrote most of the files and altered the overall direction, except for a
couple of files. The changelog entry would have been extensive.
- Amir
On 12/3/2024 5:06 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
> On 12/2/2024 8:19 PM, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote:
>> This patch series introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)
>> driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE). QTEE enables Trusted Applications (TAs)
>> and services to run securely. It uses an object-based interface, where
>> each service is an object with sets of operations. Clients can invoke
>> these operations on objects, which can generate results, including other
>> objects. For example, an object can load a TA and return another object
>> that represents the loaded TA, allowing access to its services.
>
> The first patch series was RFC and now you had removed the RFC. Can you please
> provide the reasons?
>
> https://lwn.net/ml/all/20240702-qcom-tee-object-and-ioctls-v1-0-633c3ddf57ee@quicinc.com/
>
> I understand that you have now changed to tee framework but I want to check
> if we should continue with the version and increment here or start from [00]?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists