[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97c6ef74-7ce8-4e67-85f9-d5452678f45f@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:04:13 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen
Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
<quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski
<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ajit Pandey
<quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add support for clock
controllers
On 10/26/2024 12:12 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 25.10.2024 8:42 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 25.10.2024 10:52 AM, Taniya Das wrote:
>>> Add support for video, camera, display0 and display1 clock controllers
>>> on SA8775P. The dispcc1 will be enabled based on board requirements.
>
> Actually, why would that be? CCF should park it gracefully with
> unused cleanup
>
Yes, CCF should take care to cleanup. But I am of an opinion that as we
are aware that this platform do not require the dispcc1 so we could
avoid the clock driver initialization and help in boot KPI.
> Konrad
>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Konrad
--
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists