[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a285cdf6-2a58-412f-9751-1b6f9e3edeaf@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 08:14:40 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
andrzejtp2010@...il.com, allen.lkml@...il.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, lkundrak@...sk, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: marvell: Add check for clk_enable()
Hi Jiasheng,
On 21/11/2024 21:25, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add check for the return value of clk_enable() to gurantee the success.
>
> Fixes: 81a409bfd551 ("media: marvell-ccic: provide a clock for the sensor")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c
> index 9ec01228f907..47023e701e12 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/marvell/mcam-core.c
> @@ -935,7 +935,9 @@ static int mclk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(cam->dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> - clk_enable(cam->clk[0]);
> + ret = clk_enable(cam->clk[0]);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
If clk_enable returns an error, doesn't this also require a call to pm_runtime_put() to
balance the pm_runtime_resume_and_get() call?
Regards,
Hans
> mcam_reg_write(cam, REG_CLKCTRL, (mclk_src << 29) | mclk_div);
> mcam_ctlr_power_up(cam);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists