[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mdlcm57lway2wqwh7tp6bj6mi3nlwuaeadbsmgx3h6kcfdisq5@76ikce4yqfs4>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 08:39:34 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, quentin.schulz@...rry.de,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dse@...umatec.com, Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...rry.de>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI C-/D-PHY
schema
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 05:49:31PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> + - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + "#phy-cells":
> + const: 1
> + description: |
> + Argument is mode to operate in. Supported modes are:
> + - PHY_TYPE_DPHY
> + - PHY_TYPE_CPHY
> + See include/dt-bindings/phy/phy.h for constants.
That's the only difference from version I gave review. It is approved
style of passing phy type/mode, so adding this is not valid reason to
drop my review tag and request re-review.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists