[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241203173026.1f0a6b46@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 17:30:26 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Rosen Penev
<rosenp@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kurt Kanzenbach
<kurt@...utronix.de>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>, Marcin
Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>, Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>, Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open
list:RENESAS ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] net: modernize ioremap in probe
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 00:43:13 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> If you have the hardware, and wont to work on the driver to add new
> features, then yes, you can do this sort of conversion, because you
> should find your own bugs via testing. If you don't have the hardware,
> please just leave it alone.
Which I'm pretty sure I already told Rosen :/
One more complaint. The 15 patch limit is meant as a throttling
mechanism, please do not have more than 15 outstanding patches
at a time.
I hope all the replies you got on this patch give you a clear enough
idea on how valuable the maintainers find this sort of work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists