[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dahqtkq6o6vrzfrmr76x7yd6iia4ihhcjfsaskilzw44wcjxth@ql2bkxnv6n3k>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 11:26:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-ipq5424: remove
apss_dbg clock macro
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 12:10:36PM +0530, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> Since gcc_apss_dbg_clk has no consumers, the linux kernel will turn it
That's not a reason to drop a binding.
> off. This causes a kernel crash because this clock is access protected
This could be. Please rephrase stating that this clock should not be
exposed to any user because trust zone handles it and any access would
trigger faults.
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists