[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241206095247.798c6917@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:52:47 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei
Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alan Maguire
<alan.maguire@...cle.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/19] tracing: fprobe: function_graph:
Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:35:56 +0100
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:08:56AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the 20th version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on
> > function-graph tracer. The previous version is;
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/173125372214.172790.6929368952404083802.stgit@devnote2/
> >
> > This version is rebased on v6.13-rc1 and fixes to make CONFIG_FPROBE
> > "n" by default, so that it does not enable function graph tracer by
> > default.
>
> Is there a reason why you didn't add the ACKs I provided for s390
> related patches for v19 of this series?
Probably just missed it.
Masami,
One thing I usually do when I rebase to a new series is to take my older
patch series from Patchwork and reapply them. Because patchwork will pick
up any acks, reviewed-bys or tested-bys. I then only drop the tags if the
patch needs significant changes.
You can also use b4 to do the same.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists