[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241206093556.9026-B-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:35:56 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/19] tracing: fprobe: function_graph:
Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:08:56AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 20th version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on
> function-graph tracer. The previous version is;
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/173125372214.172790.6929368952404083802.stgit@devnote2/
>
> This version is rebased on v6.13-rc1 and fixes to make CONFIG_FPROBE
> "n" by default, so that it does not enable function graph tracer by
> default.
Is there a reason why you didn't add the ACKs I provided for s390
related patches for v19 of this series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists