linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/31] Prepare GHES driver to support error injection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241207093922.1efa02ec@foz.lan>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 09:39:22 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jonathan Cameron
 <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, Philippe
 Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>, Ani Sinha
 <anisinha@...hat.com>, Cleber Rosa <crosa@...hat.com>, Dongjiu Geng
 <gengdongjiu1@...il.com>, Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@...kost.net>, Eric Blake
 <eblake@...hat.com>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, John Snow
 <jsnow@...hat.com>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@...il.com>, Michael
 Roth <michael.roth@....com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Peter
 Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>, Shannon Zhao
 <shannon.zhaosl@...il.com>, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@...wei.com>, Zhao Liu
 <zhao1.liu@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 qemu-arm@...gnu.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] Prepare GHES driver to support error injection

Em Sat, 07 Dec 2024 07:15:19 +0100
Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com> escreveu:

> Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com> writes:
> 
> > This is v10, right?  
> 
> Scratch that, the cover letter explains: "As agreed duing v10 review,
> I'll be splitting the big patch series into separate pull requests,
> starting with the cleanup series.  This is the first patch set,
> containing only such preparation patches."

Please scratch this series. It seems I picked the wrong git range,
sending a lot more patches than intended.

> However, it doesn't apply for me.  What's your base?

That's weird. Despite my mistake, the series is based on v9.2.0-rc3 
(which was identical to master last time I rebased).

Should it be based against some other branch?

Thanks,
Mauro