[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8268b1cf-bb7d-480a-8269-08616ad0aca8@lucifer.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:14:24 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm tree
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:28:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In file included from mm/mmap.c:50:
> include/linux/memfd.h:27:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'memfd_check_seals_mmap' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 27 | int memfd_check_seals_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long *vm_flags)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from fs/fcntl.c:26:
> include/linux/memfd.h:27:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'memfd_check_seals_mmap' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 27 | int memfd_check_seals_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long *vm_flags)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from mm/gup.c:8:
> include/linux/memfd.h:27:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'memfd_check_seals_mmap' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 27 | int memfd_check_seals_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long *vm_flags)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from mm/secretmem.c:12:
> include/linux/memfd.h:27:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'memfd_check_seals_mmap' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 27 | int memfd_check_seals_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long *vm_flags)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: mm/mmap.o: in function `memfd_check_seals_mmap':
> mmap.c:(.text+0x200): multiple definition of `memfd_check_seals_mmap'; mm/gup.o:gup.c:(.text+0xf60): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: mm/secretmem.o: in function `memfd_check_seals_mmap':
> secretmem.c:(.text+0x3c0): multiple definition of `memfd_check_seals_mmap'; mm/gup.o:gup.c:(.text+0xf60): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fs/fcntl.o: in function `memfd_check_seals_mmap':
> fcntl.c:(.text+0x270): multiple definition of `memfd_check_seals_mmap'; mm/gup.o:gup.c:(.text+0xf60): first defined here
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 6b72648c4e2b ("mm: perform all memfd seal checks in a single place")
>
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree.
>
> I have applied the following patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:23:48 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "mm: perform all memfd seal checks in a single place"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> include/linux/memfd.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memfd.h b/include/linux/memfd.h
> index d53408b0bd31..4397e3b4f0f9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memfd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memfd.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static inline struct folio *memfd_alloc_folio(struct file *memfd, pgoff_t idx)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> -int memfd_check_seals_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long *vm_flags)
> +static inline int memfd_check_seals_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long *vm_flags)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> --
Thanks, apologies for this, a rather silly typo. I have now sent a
fix-patch to Andrew so hopefully this should come out in the wash also from
mm side.
> 2.45.2
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists