[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c05ea1c3-28ae-4c31-b204-05db59b626d6@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:11:08 +0300
From: Maksim Davydov <davydov-max@...dex-team.ru>
To: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@....com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
babu.moger@....com, seanjc@...gle.com, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86: KVM: Advertise FSRS and FSRC on AMD to
userspace
On 12/6/24 21:11, Moger, Babu wrote:
>
> On 12/4/2024 10:57 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:43 AM Maksim Davydov
>> <davydov-max@...dex-team.ru> wrote:
>>> Fast short REP STOSB and fast short CMPSB support on AMD processors are
>>> provided in other CPUID function in comparison with Intel processors:
>>> * FSRS: 10 bit in 0x80000021_EAX
>>> * FSRC: 11 bit in 0x80000021_EAX
>> I have to wonder why these bits aren't documented in the APM. I assume
>> you pulled them out of some PPR? I would be hesitant to include CPUID
>> bit definitions that may be microarchitecture-specific rather than
>> architectural.
>>
>> Perhaps someone from AMD should at least ACK this change?
>
> APM updates are in progress right now, but haven’t been able to get an ETA.
>
> Will confirm once APM is released.
>
Thanks a lot!
It means that this series should be sent as 2 independent parts:
1. FSRS and FSRC will wait for updated APM
2. Speculation control bits will be sent as a separate patch
>>> AMD bit numbers differ from existing definition of FSRC and
>>> FSRS. So, the new appropriate values have to be added with new names.
>>>
>>> It's safe to advertise these features to userspace because they are a part
>>> of CPU model definition and they can't be disabled (as existing Intel
>>> features).
>>>
>>> Fixes: 2a4209d6a9cb ("KVM: x86: Advertise fast REP string features inherent to the CPU")
>>> Signed-off-by: Maksim Davydov<davydov-max@...dex-team.ru>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 ++
>>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 4 ++--
>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>>> index 17b6590748c0..45f87a026bba 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>>> @@ -460,6 +460,8 @@
>>> #define X86_FEATURE_NULL_SEL_CLR_BASE (20*32+ 6) /* Null Selector Clears Base */
>>> #define X86_FEATURE_AUTOIBRS (20*32+ 8) /* Automatic IBRS */
>>> #define X86_FEATURE_NO_SMM_CTL_MSR (20*32+ 9) /* SMM_CTL MSR is not present */
>>> +#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_FSRS (20*32+10) /* AMD Fast short REP STOSB supported */
>>> +#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_FSRC (20*32+11) /* AMD Fast short REP CMPSB supported */
>>>
>>> #define X86_FEATURE_SBPB (20*32+27) /* Selective Branch Prediction Barrier */
>>> #define X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE (20*32+28) /* MSR_PRED_CMD[IBPB] flushes all branch type predictions */
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> index 097bdc022d0f..7bc095add8ee 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> @@ -799,8 +799,8 @@ void kvm_set_cpu_caps(void)
>>>
>>> kvm_cpu_cap_mask(CPUID_8000_0021_EAX,
>>> F(NO_NESTED_DATA_BP) | F(LFENCE_RDTSC) | 0 /* SmmPgCfgLock */ |
>>> - F(NULL_SEL_CLR_BASE) | F(AUTOIBRS) | 0 /* PrefetchCtlMsr */ |
>>> - F(WRMSR_XX_BASE_NS)
>>> + F(NULL_SEL_CLR_BASE) | F(AUTOIBRS) | F(AMD_FSRS) |
>>> + F(AMD_FSRC) | 0 /* PrefetchCtlMsr */ | F(WRMSR_XX_BASE_NS)
>>> );
>>>
>>> kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_SBPB);
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
--
Best regards,
Maksim Davydov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists