[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241210-eckig-april-9ffc098f193b@brauner>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:43:17 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@...look.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, memxor@...il.com, snorcht@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/5] bpf: Make fs kfuncs available for
SYSCALL and TRACING program types
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 02:03:53PM +0000, Juntong Deng wrote:
> Currently fs kfuncs are only available for LSM program type, but fs
> kfuncs are generic and useful for scenarios other than LSM.
>
> This patch makes fs kfuncs available for SYSCALL and TRACING
> program types.
I would like a detailed explanation from the maintainers what it means
to make this available to SYSCALL program types, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists