[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b859bdcd-7343-4d53-9f3a-f374deca725a@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:43:05 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] arm64/sysreg: Update ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1 to DDI0601
2024-09
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 05:09:55PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Can we _please_ just generate this stuff. It feels like we've been
> making silly typos over and over again with the current approach so
> either it's hard or we're not very good at it. Either way, it should be
> automated.
> Others have managed it [1], so it's clearly do-able.
Yes, the issues here are not technical ones. Though there are some
complications - eg, IIRC the XML doesn't encode the signedness of
fields like we do and there's areas where we've deliberately diverged.
Given the amount of review I end up having to do of sysreg changes your
reasoning is especially apparent to me. I've passed this feedback on
(again).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists