[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1nJdd3YF5YGvlqp@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 09:18:45 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>,
Dima Kogan <dima@...retsauce.net>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf probe: Fix uninitialized variable
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:15:30AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 08:55:23AM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> > Since the linked fixes: commit, err is returned uninitialized due to the
> > removal of "return 0". Initialize err to fix it.
> >
> > This fixes the following intermittent test failure on release builds:
> >
> > $ perf test "testsuite_probe"
> > ...
> > -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_probe :: test_invalid_options :: mutually exclusive options :: -L foo -V bar (output regexp parsing)
> > Regexp not found: \"Error: switch .+ cannot be used with switch .+\"
> > ...
>
> So Namhyung, this one should go to perf-tools, I can pick the second on
> perf-tools-next, so that we keep perf-tools as small as possible.
Sure, will replace and force-push.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists