[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a03ae7e8-391e-4303-91fc-15a59979fd2a@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:18:46 -0800
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Helen Mae Koike Fornazier <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
Vignesh Raman
<vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
freedreno
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: add kms_cursor_legacy@...ture-bo to apq8016
flakes
Hi Helen / Vignesh
On 12/4/2024 12:33 PM, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote:
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 16:21:26 -0300 Abhinav Kumar wrote ---
>
> > Hi Helen
> >
> > On 12/4/2024 11:14 AM, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote:
> > > Hi Abhinav,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:55:17 -0300 Abhinav Kumar wrote ---
> > >
> > > > From the jobs [1] and [2] of pipeline [3], its clear that
> > > > kms_cursor_legacy@...ture-bo is most certainly a flake and
> > > > not a fail for apq8016. Mark the test accordingly to match the results.
> > > >
> > > > [1] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67676481
> > > > [2] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67677430
> > > > [3]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1322770
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt | 5 +++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..18639853f18f
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > > > +# Board Name: msm-apq8016-db410c
> > > > +# Failure Rate: 100
> > >
> > > Is failure rate is 100%, isn't it a fail than?
> > > (I know we have other cases with Failure Rate: 100, maybe we should fix them as well)
> > >
> >
> > Maybe I misunderstood the meaning of "Failure rate" for a flake.
> >
> > I interpreted this as this test being flaky 100% of the time :)
>
> Ah right, I see, inside deqp-runner (that auto-retries).
>
> I'd like to hear Vignesh's opinion on this.
>
> (In any case, we probably should document this better)
>
> Regards,
> Helen
>
Can you let me know which way we need to go?
Just in case I did post a v2 fixing this,
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/627276/
If thats the way to go, can you pls take a look?
Thanks
Abhinav
> >
> > Out of the 3 runs of the test, it passed 2/3 times and failed 1/3.
> >
> > So its fail % actually is 33.33% in that case.
> >
> > I think I saw a Failure rate of 100% on msm-sm8350-hdk-flakes.txt and
> > mistook that as the rate at which flakes are seen.
> >
> > Let me fix this up as 33%
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > Helen
> > >
> > > > +# IGT Version: 1.28-ga73311079
> > > > +# Linux Version: 6.12.0-rc2
> > > > +kms_cursor_legacy@...ture-bo
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > base-commit: 798bb342e0416d846cf67f4725a3428f39bfb96b
> > > > change-id: 20241204-cursor_tor_skip-9d128dd62c4f
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > --
> > > > Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists