lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1kLskERnpeH1A45@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:49:06 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Ole Schuerks <ole0811sch@...il.com>
Cc: deltaone@...ian.org, jan.sollmann@....de, jude.gyimah@....de,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, nicolas@...sle.eu,
	thorsten.berger@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] kbuild: Add list_size, list_at_index,
 list_for_each_from

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 02:00:19AM +0100, Ole Schuerks wrote:
> > What's wrong with list_count_nodes()?
> 
> > list_for_each_entry_from() exists on my tree on linux-next added
> > through commit e229c2fb3370a ("[LIST]: Introduce
> > list_for_each_entry_from") since v2.6.17, so since 2006.
> 
> These macros only exist in include/linux/list.h, not in
> scripts/include/list.h. My assumption was that the build system should only
> use scripts/include/list.h.

We can update scripts/include/list.h from include/linux/list.h. So just
say, bleh blah exists in bleh bleh bleh.

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ