linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] ACPI: bus: implement acpi_get_physical_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241211091602.1907f790@foz.lan>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 09:16:12 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
 <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Robert Moore
 <robert.moore@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Dan Carpenter
 <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] ACPI: bus: implement
 acpi_get_physical_device_location when !ACPI

Em Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:56:00 +0000
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org> escreveu:

> Provide an implementation of acpi_get_physical_device_location that can
> be used when CONFIG_ACPI is not set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> 


> dasadsd
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>

Please remove duplicated SOB.

What "dasadsd" mean?


> ---
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index eaafca41cf02..520f12155e7f 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -43,9 +43,6 @@ acpi_status
>  acpi_evaluate_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, u32 status_code,
>  		  struct acpi_buffer *status_buf);
>  
> -acpi_status
> -acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
> -
>  bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name);
>  acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
>  				       u64 arg);
> @@ -60,6 +57,9 @@ bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 funcs);
>  union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid,
>  			u64 rev, u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +acpi_status
> +acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
> +
>  static inline union acpi_object *
>  acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev,
>  			u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4,
> @@ -1003,6 +1003,12 @@ static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
>  
>  static inline int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void) { return 0; }
>  
> +static inline acpi_status
> +acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld)
> +{
> +	return AE_ERROR;
> +}
> +
>  #define for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, uid, hrv)			\
>  	for (adev = NULL; false && (hid) && (uid) && (hrv);)
>  
> 



Thanks,
Mauro