lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiDSCvkBvdstVn4GwtdNiJhs67TO6rXVBcsdfRJNgNMXkjvKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 09:19:07 +0100
From: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <maurochehab@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, 
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev, 
	kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] media: ipu-bridge: Fix warning when !ACPI

Hi Mauro

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 09:15, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<maurochehab@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:55:58 +0000
> Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org> escreveu:
>
> > One of the quirks that we introduced to build with !ACPI && COMPILE_TEST
> > throws the following smatch warning:
> > drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c:752 ipu_bridge_ivsc_is_ready() warn: iterator 'i' not incremented
> >
> > Fix it by replacing the condition.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411221147.N6w23gDo-lkp@intel.com/
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202411221147.N6w23gDo-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
> > index a0e9a71580b5..be82bc3e27d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu-bridge.c
> > @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ static int ipu_bridge_ivsc_is_ready(void)
> >
> >               for_each_acpi_dev_match(sensor_adev, cfg->hid, NULL, -1) {
> >  #else
> > -             while (true) {
> > +             while (false) {
> >                       sensor_adev = NULL;
> >  #endif
>
> The better would be to just remove all #if and handle ACPI compatibility
> with COMPILE_TEST inside acpi headers.
>
> Besides that, t sounds that patch 2 makes this hack unneeded, as you added
> a false check at the for macro:
>
>         #define for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, uid, hrv)                    \
>         for (adev = NULL; false && (hid) && (uid) && (hrv);)
>
> Please place only one set of subsystem maintainers at the To: line,
> directing to the one(s) you expect to merge this series.
>
> In this particular case, the one to be added should be the ACPI
> maintainers.

The plan was to land 1/7 via the media tree with a PR from Sakari soonish.

I believe he has already picked it on his tree. I will remove you from
Cc in the next version

thanks :)

>
> Regards,
> Mauro



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ