[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173398725978.3728083.17030127353710822170.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 23:07:39 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, akanksha@...ux.ibm.com, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hbathini@...ux.ibm.com,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test expr: Fix system_tsc_freq for only x86
On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:23:05 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> The refactoring of tool PMU events to have a PMU then adding the expr
> literals to the tool PMU made it so that the literal system_tsc_freq
> was only supported on x86. Update the test expectations to match -
> namely the parsing is x86 specific and only yields a non-zero value on
> Intel.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists