[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E5B2B419-C68C-45FA-9B79-7F6D5B138EDE@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:51 +0530
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
akanksha@...ux.ibm.com, maddy@...ux.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hbathini@...ux.ibm.com,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test expr: Fix system_tsc_freq for only x86
> On 12 Dec 2024, at 12:37 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:23:05 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
>
>> The refactoring of tool PMU events to have a PMU then adding the expr
>> literals to the tool PMU made it so that the literal system_tsc_freq
>> was only supported on x86. Update the test expectations to match -
>> namely the parsing is x86 specific and only yields a non-zero value on
>> Intel.
>>
>>
>> [...]
>
> Applied to perf-tools, thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Namhyung
>
Thanks Namhyung for pulling this in
Athira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists