lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba6e9400-56aa-446f-a93e-aff0ea81f357@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:57:59 -0800
From: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
	Min Ma <min.ma@....com>, Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Narendra Gutta
	<VenkataNarendraKumar.Gutta@....com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] accel/amdxdna: use modern PM helpers


On 12/13/24 09:49, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 12/13/2024 10:41 AM, Lizhi Hou wrote:
>>
>> On 12/13/24 09:07, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>>> On 12/13/2024 2:02 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>>
>>>> The old SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS and SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS macros cause 
>>>> a build
>>>> warning when CONFIG_PM is disabled:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_pci_drv.c:343:12: error: 
>>>> 'amdxdna_pmops_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>>>>    343 | static int amdxdna_pmops_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>>        |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_pci_drv.c:328:12: error: 
>>>> 'amdxdna_pmops_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>>>>    328 | static int amdxdna_pmops_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>>        |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> Change these to the modern replacements.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>
>>> Looks sane to me.
>>>
>>> Lizhi, can you verify that this works as expected for you? I'd hate 
>>> to accidentally break something.
>>
>> Verified suspend/resume. It works fine.
>
> Excellent.  Would you like to give a reviewed-by and/or a tested-by?

Reviewed-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>

Tested-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>

>
> -Jeff
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ