linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: mdio: Add RTL9300 MDIO driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241213195911.GF561418@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:59:11 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, hkallweit1@...il.com,
	linux@...linux.org.uk, markus.stockhausen@....de,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: mdio: Add RTL9300 MDIO driver

On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 12:53:42PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> Add a driver for the MDIO controller on the RTL9300 family of Ethernet
> switches with integrated SoC. There are 4 physical SMI interfaces on the
> RTL9300 but access is done using the switch ports so a single MDIO bus
> is presented to the rest of the system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>

...

> diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-realtek-rtl.c b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-realtek-rtl.c

...

> +static int realtek_mdiobus_init(struct realtek_mdio_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	u32 port_addr[5] = { };
> +	u32 poll_sel[2] = { 0, 0 };
> +	u32 glb_ctrl_mask = 0, glb_ctrl_val = 0;
> +	int i, err;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORTS; i++) {
> +		int pos;
> +
> +		if (priv->smi_bus[i] > 3)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		pos = (i % 6) * 5;
> +		port_addr[i / 6] |=  priv->smi_addr[i] << pos;

Hi Chris,

The maximum index of port_addr accessed above is
(MAX_PORTS - 1) / 6 = (32 - 1) / 6 = 5.
But port_addr only has five elements (maximum index of 4).
So this will overflow.

Flagged by Smatch.

> +
> +		pos = (i % 16) * 2;
> +		poll_sel[i / 16] |= priv->smi_bus[i] << pos;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_SMI_BUSSES; i++) {
> +		if (priv->smi_bus_isc45[i]) {
> +			glb_ctrl_mask |= GLB_CTRL_INTF_SEL(i);
> +			glb_ctrl_val |= GLB_CTRL_INTF_SEL(i);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	err = regmap_bulk_write(priv->regmap, priv->reg_base + SMI_PORT0_5_ADDR_CTRL,
> +				port_addr, 5);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	err = regmap_bulk_write(priv->regmap, priv->reg_base + SMI_PORT0_15_POLLING_SEL,
> +				poll_sel, 2);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	err = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, priv->reg_base + SMI_GLB_CTRL,
> +				 glb_ctrl_mask, glb_ctrl_val);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int realtek_mdiobus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct realtek_mdio_priv *priv;
> +	struct fwnode_handle *child;
> +	struct mii_bus *bus;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(dev, sizeof(*priv));
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	bus->name = "Reaktek Switch MDIO Bus";
> +	bus->read_c45 = realtek_mdio_read_c45;
> +	bus->write_c45 =  realtek_mdio_write_c45;
> +	bus->parent = dev;
> +	priv = bus->priv;
> +
> +	priv->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
> +
> +	err = device_property_read_u32(dev, "reg", &priv->reg_base);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", dev_name(dev));
> +
> +	device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
> +		u32 pn, smi_addr[2];
> +
> +		err = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &pn);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		if (pn > MAX_PORTS)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "illegal port number %d\n", pn);
> +
> +		err = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child, "realtek,smi-address", smi_addr, 2);
> +		if (err) {
> +			smi_addr[0] = 0;
> +			smi_addr[1] = pn;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (fwnode_device_is_compatible(child, "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"))
> +			priv->smi_bus_isc45[smi_addr[0]] = true;
> +
> +		priv->smi_bus[pn] = smi_addr[0];
> +		priv->smi_addr[pn] = smi_addr[1];

The condition about 15 lines above ensures that the maximum value of pn
is MAX_PORTS. But if this is the case then the above will overflow
both smi_bus and smi_addr as they each have MAX_PORTS elements
(maximum index of MAX_PORTS - 1).

I suspect the condition above should be updated to:

	if (pn >= MAX_PORTS)
		return ...

Also flagged by Smatch.

> +	}
> +
> +	err = realtek_mdiobus_init(priv);
> +	if (err)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to initialise MDIO bus controller\n");
> +
> +	err = devm_of_mdiobus_register(dev, bus, dev->of_node);
> +	if (err)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "cannot register MDIO bus\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

...