[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbAD-USZYry6dToxDTM-OO1+Rz0g6XQkCjhzhWDt7g4MGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:36:10 +0800
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] vsprintf: Add %pTN to print task name
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:05 PM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri 2024-12-13 13:46:04, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > Since the task->comm is guaranteed to be NUL-ternimated, we can print it
> > directly. Add a new vsnprintf format specifier "%pTN" to print task comm,
> > where 'p' represents the task Pointer, 'T' stands for Task, and 'N' denots
> > Name. With this abstraction, the user no longer needs to care about
> > retrieving task name.
>
> What is the advantage, please?
The advantage is that it provides the flexibility to modify the comm
representation to meet future requirements. For instance, we could
rename it to "task_name" and increase its size.
>
> Honestly, I believe that the meaning of
>
> printk("%s\n", task->comm);
>
> is much more clear than using a cryptic %pXYZ modifier:
>
> printk("%pTN\n", task);
>
>
> The %pXYZ modifiers makes sense only when the formatting of the printed
> information needs some processing. But this is a plain string.
That makes sense to me.
> IMHO, it is not worth it. In fact, I believe that it is a
> counter productive.
Linus, what are your thoughts?
--
Regards
Yafang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists