[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a047e4b8-c2d6-4486-8037-e7b854660cb1@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:02:59 +0200
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Barnabas Czeman <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>, David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: qcom: camss: Restrict endpoint bus-type to
D-PHY
On 12/9/24 14:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 09/12/2024 12:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> Currently the Qualcomm CAMSS driver only supports D-PHY while the
>> hardware on most SoCs also supports C-PHY. Until this support is added,
>> check for D-PHY to make it somewhat explicit that C-PHY won't work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>> index 9fb31f4c18adee886cd0bcf84438a8f27635e07f..b99af35074cdf6fa794a0d2f0d54ecf12ac354d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>> @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ static int camss_of_parse_endpoint_node(struct device *dev,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Most SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards, but currently only
>> + * D-PHY is supported in the driver.
>> + */
>> + if (vep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported bus type %d\n", vep.bus_type);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
Looks like it would break all old board dtbs, which is not just bad, but NAK.
V4L2_MBUS_UNKNOWN shall be properly handled without the risk of regressions.
>> csd->interface.csiphy_id = vep.base.port;
>>
>> mipi_csi2 = &vep.bus.mipi_csi2;
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists