[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7e3076e-5b32-4ab8-afe8-f52458769f23@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:34:24 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Barnabas Czeman <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>, David Heidelberg
<david@...t.cz>, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Restrict bus-type
property
On 13/12/2024 11:24, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Fri Dec 13, 2024 at 11:50 AM CET, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> On 12/13/24 11:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 01:01:05PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> The CSIPHY of Qualcomm SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards for
>>>> CSI-2, but not any others so restrict the bus-type property describing
>>>> this to the supported values.
>>>>
>>>> The only exception here is MSM8916 which only supports D-PHY. C-PHY was
>>>> introduced with newer SoCs.
>>>>
>>>> Do note, that currently the Linux driver only supports D-PHY.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/media/qcom,msm8916-camss.yaml | 8 ++++++
>>>> .../bindings/media/qcom,msm8953-camss.yaml | 15 +++++++++++
>>>> .../bindings/media/qcom,msm8996-camss.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++
>>>> .../bindings/media/qcom,sc8280xp-camss.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++
>>>> .../bindings/media/qcom,sdm660-camss.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++
>>>> .../bindings/media/qcom,sdm845-camss.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++
>>>> .../bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-camss.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 7 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,msm8916-camss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,msm8916-camss.yaml
>>>> index 9cc0a968a401836814560c1af3ee84d946500b4f..3de2a3d2b5b761106975aab65ff614b2ef579ef5 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,msm8916-camss.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,msm8916-camss.yaml
>>>> @@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ properties:
>>>> minItems: 1
>>>> maxItems: 4
>>>>
>>>> + bus-type:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - 4 # MEDIA_BUS_TYPE_CSI2_DPHY
>>>> +
>>>> required:
>>>> - data-lanes
>>>>
>>>> @@ -113,6 +117,10 @@ properties:
>>>> minItems: 1
>>>> maxItems: 4
>>>>
>>>> + bus-type:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - 4 # MEDIA_BUS_TYPE_CSI2_DPHY
>>>> +
>>
>> But is it really needed to specify the single supported bus-type?
>>
>> I believe it is not, at least it's not ever done for other media devices
>> like sensors.
>
> Through video-interfaces.yaml 'bus-type' is already allowed but not
> restricted to the values that actually make any sense on such hardware,
> so in my opinion this makes sense to have here.
This is additive not prescriptive.
New additions should include this bus-type number as we will need it
when we add CPHY support and the subsequently move to the PHY API for
CAMSS PHYs.
So still in favour of this amendment.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists