[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024121358-isolation-tanned-6a2d@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:34:25 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/466] 6.12.5-rc1 review
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 01:18:07AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 01:04, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 23:35, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.5 release.
> > > > There are 466 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:41:35 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.5-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > The riscv builds failed on Linux stable-rc linux-6.12.y due to following build
> > > warnings / errors.
> > >
> > > riscv:
> > > * build/gcc-13-defconfig
> > > * build/clang-19-defconfig
> > > * build/clang-nightly-defconfig
> > > * build/gcc-8-defconfig
> > >
> > > First seen on Linux stable-rc linux-6.12.y v6.12.4-467-g3f47dc0fd5b1,
> > > Good: v6.12.4
> > > Bad: 6.12.5-rc1
> > >
> > >
> > > Build log:
> > > -----------
> > > kernel/time/timekeeping.c: In function 'timekeeping_debug_get_ns':
> > > kernel/time/timekeeping.c:263:17: error: too few arguments to function
> > > 'clocksource_delta'
> > > 263 | delta = clocksource_delta(now, last, mask);
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from kernel/time/timekeeping.c:30:
> > > kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h:18:19: note: declared here
> > > 18 | static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64
> > > mask, u64 max_delta)
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: kernel/time/timekeeping.o] Error 1
> >
> > The bisect log pointing to first bad commit,
> >
> > clocksource: Make negative motion detection more robust
> > commit 76031d9536a076bf023bedbdb1b4317fc801dd67 upstream.
>
> This issue was fixed in the upstream by adding the following patch,
> timekeeping: Remove CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING
> commit d44d26987bb3df6d76556827097fc9ce17565cb8 upstream
Kind of, it needed another commit as well, I've queued up the needed
ones and will push out a -rc2 soon.
thanks for testing!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists