linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2 00/16] mm: Introduce arch_mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241212173609.afd41d1dffbefe0d731ed4ed@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:36:09 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Kalesh Singh
 <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, vbabka@...e.cz, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
 riel@...riel.com, david@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org, jyescas@...gle.com,
 linux@...linux.org.uk, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
 James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
 dalias@...c.org, glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, davem@...emloft.net,
 andreas@...sler.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, chris@...kel.net,
 jcmvbkbc@...il.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, jason.andryuk@....com,
 leitao@...ian.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
 loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
 sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 android-mm@...gle.com, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2 00/16] mm: Introduce arch_mmap_hint()

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:51:34 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:

> You've fundamentally violated kernel process and etiquette. I'd be more
> forgiving, but this is at v2 and you've not cc'd KEY people. Twice. This is
> totally unacceptable. See [0] if you are unsure of how to do so.

This feels excessive to me.  linux-mm averages a mere 140 mesages/day
and it seems reasonable to assume that key people are spending their 5
minutes to scroll through the email subjects.