[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c01fab26-876f-4ffa-9360-c6746bbb467e@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:12:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] arm64: dts: morello: Add support for soc dts
On 13/12/2024 17:32, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> The Morello architecture is an experimental extension to Armv8.2-A,
> which extends the AArch64 state with the principles proposed in
> version 7 of the Capability Hardware Enhanced RISC Instructions
> (CHERI) ISA.
>
> Introduce Morello SoC dts.
So Morello is an architecture, not a board or platform? You cannot have
both...
>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/morello-soc.dts | 267 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 267 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/morello-soc.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/morello-soc.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/morello-soc.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3c5247121e4d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/morello-soc.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2021-2024, Arm Limited. All rights reserved.
> +
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +#include "morello.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Arm Morello System Development Platform";
> +
> + chosen {
> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> + };
> +
> + reserved-memory {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + secure-firmware@...00000 {
> + reg = <0 0xff000000 0 0x01000000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + cpu0: cpu0@0 {
> + compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1";
> + reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + clocks = <&scmi_dvfs 0>;
> + };
> + cpu1: cpu1@100 {
> + compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1";
> + reg = <0x0 0x100>;
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + clocks = <&scmi_dvfs 0>;
> + };
> + cpu2: cpu2@...00 {
> + compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1";
> + reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + clocks = <&scmi_dvfs 1>;
> + };
> + cpu3: cpu3@...00 {
> + compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1";
> + reg = <0x0 0x10100>;
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + clocks = <&scmi_dvfs 1>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + /* The first bank of memory, memory map is actually provided by UEFI. */
> + memory@...00000 {
> + device_type = "memory";
> + /* [0x80000000-0xffffffff] */
> + reg = <0x00000000 0x80000000 0x0 0x7F000000>;
> + };
> +
> + memory@...0000000 {
> + device_type = "memory";
> + /* [0x8080000000-0x83f7ffffff] */
> + reg = <0x00000080 0x80000000 0x3 0x78000000>;
> + };
> +
> + smmu_pcie: iommu@...00000 {
This all is weird. MMIO nodes outside of soc, soc pieces defined in DTS
instead of DTSI.
Please look first how all other DTS and DTSI are done. Also carefully
read DTS coding style.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists