[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2qx75syaojhnsqt256li6sinafml4gohohvld6uw3zhejrayuj@biiep5dvko7t>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:39:35 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>,
Roxana Bradescu <roxabee@...gle.com>, bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_5XX_GOLD to the
spectre_bhb_k24_list
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:28:55PM -0800, Julius Werner wrote:
> > Interesting. So the Gold/Prime are actually IDing themselves as
> > straight Cortex A77. The Silver is IDing itself the same as
> > KRYO_4XX_SILVER. ...so in that sense there's nothing to do here for
> > those cores.
>
> Should we add some comments to cputype.h to record which other
> products are matched under the same ID?
I'd say, yes.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists