[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAODwPW919K+XdxjUe3aPgxsv0CEWwx0P_Hxvf=VniLhk8eagkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:28:55 -0800
From: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>, Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>,
Roxana Bradescu <roxabee@...gle.com>, bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_5XX_GOLD to the spectre_bhb_k24_list
> Interesting. So the Gold/Prime are actually IDing themselves as
> straight Cortex A77. The Silver is IDing itself the same as
> KRYO_4XX_SILVER. ...so in that sense there's nothing to do here for
> those cores.
Should we add some comments to cputype.h to record which other
products are matched under the same ID?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists